翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Deferred compensation
・ Deferred deep linking
・ Deferred financing cost
・ Deferred income
・ Deferred maintenance
・ Deferred Measurement Principle
・ Deferred Procedure Call
・ Deferred prosecution
・ Deferred reference
・ Deferred sentence
・ Deferred shading
・ Defense of Democracies
・ Defense of Harbin
・ Defense of Hengyang
・ Defense of infancy
Defense of Marriage Act
・ Defense of Marriage Act (Texas)
・ Defense of marriage amendment
・ Defense of Schwedt Bridgehead
・ Defense of Sihang Warehouse
・ Defense of the Adzhimushkay quarry
・ Defense of the Ancients
・ Defense of the Great Wall
・ Defense of the Polish Post Office in Danzig
・ Defense of the Revolution
・ Defense of Van
・ Defense of Van (1896)
・ Defense of Van (1915)
・ Defense Officer Personnel Management Act
・ Defense pact


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Defense of Marriage Act : ウィキペディア英語版
Defense of Marriage Act

The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) (, and ) is a United States federal law that, prior to being ruled unconstitutional, defined marriage for federal purposes as the union of one man and one woman, and allowed states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages granted under the laws of other states. Until Section 3 of the Act was struck down in 2013 (''United States v. Windsor''), DOMA, in conjunction with other statutes, had barred same-sex married couples from being recognized as "spouses" for purposes of federal laws, effectively barring them from receiving federal marriage benefits. DOMA's passage did not prevent individual states from recognizing same-sex marriage, but it imposed constraints on the benefits received by all legally married same-sex couples.
Initially introduced in May 1996, DOMA passed both houses of Congress by large, veto-proof majorities and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton in September 1996. By defining "spouse" and its related terms to signify a heterosexual couple in a recognized marriage, Section 3 codified non-recognition of same-sex marriages for all federal purposes, including insurance benefits for government employees, social security survivors' benefits, immigration, bankruptcy, and the filing of joint tax returns, as well as excluding same-sex spouses from the scope of laws protecting families of federal officers (18 U. S. C. §115), laws evaluating financial aid eligibility, and federal ethics laws applicable to opposite-sex spouses.

In ''United States v. Windsor'' (2013), the U.S. Supreme Court declared Section 3 of DOMA unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
==Background==
(詳細はJack Baker brought suit against the state of Minnesota in 1970 after being denied a marriage license to marry another man; the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled (in ''Baker v. Nelson'') that limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples did not violate the Constitution. Baker later changed his legal name to Pat Lynn McConnell and married his male partner in 1971, but the marriage was not legally recognized. A 1972 off-Broadway play, ''Nightride'', depicted "a black–white homosexual marriage".〔For a review of the play see 〕 In 1979, IntegrityUSA, an organization of gay Episcopalians, raised the issue when the U.S. Episcopal Church considered a ban on the ordination of homosexuals as priests.〔For the theological background beginning in 1967, see 〕
The ''New York Times'' said the question was "all but dormant" until the late 1980s when, according to gay activists, "the AIDS epidemic... brought questions of inheritance and death benefits to many people's minds." In May 1989, Denmark established registered partnerships that granted same-sex couples many of the rights associated with marriage.〔 In the same year, New York's highest court ruled that two homosexual men qualified as a family for the purposes of New York City's rent-control regulations.〔 Within the movement for gay and lesbian rights, a debate between advocates of sexual liberation and of social integration was taking shape, with Andrew Sullivan publishing an essay "Here Comes the Groom" in ''The New Republic'' in August 1989 arguing for same-sex marriage: "A need to rebel has quietly ceded to a desire to belong."〔 In September 1989, the State Bar Association of California urged recognition of marriages between homosexuals even before gay rights advocates adopted the issue.〔
Gary Bauer, head of the socially conservative Family Research Council, predicted the issue would be "a major battleground in the 1990s".〔 In 1991, Georgia Attorney General Michael J. Bowers withdrew a job offer to a lesbian who planned to marry another woman in a Jewish wedding ceremony. In 1993, a committee of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America released a report asking Lutherans to consider blessing same-sex marriages and stating that lifelong abstinence was harmful to same-sex couples. The Conference of Bishops responded, "There is basis neither in Scripture nor tradition for the establishment of an official ceremony by this church for the blessing of a homosexual relationship." In a critique of radicalism in the gay liberation movement, Bruce Bawer's ''A Place at the Table'' (1993) advocated the legalization of same-sex marriage.
In ''Baehr v. Miike'' (1993), the Supreme Court of Hawaii ruled that the state must show a compelling interest in prohibiting same-sex marriage.〔The case was originally ''Baehr v. Lewin''. 〕 This finding prompted concern among opponents of same-sex marriage, who feared that same-sex marriage might become legal in Hawaii and that other states would recognize or be compelled to recognize those marriages under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution. The House Judiciary Committee's 1996 Report called for DOMA as a response to ''Baehr'', because "a redefinition of marriage in Hawaii to include homosexual couples could make such couples eligible for a whole range of federal rights and benefits".

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Defense of Marriage Act」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.